Technically, I am not an "escapee" in the sense that people working on their phds use the term. I had a career before academia, I had a successful career in academia (shoves substantial pile pile of publications into closet), and last year i received an opportunity to do something absolutely awesome so I left (5evah). Although I have had many opportunities to do interesting things purely because LUCK created my CV of gold and because of what my degrees/network are. (I turned down other offers this year, in academia and in industry... I still review papers when journal editors knock.)
That said, I know far Far FAR MORE people who have no good options post academia and in-academia is full of suck for the vast majority. I ... never experienced the suck (and it isn't like I am old either). I guess that puts me some rare unicorn status... :/
Anyhoo.
My own (admittedly limited) impression of people in that age cohort is that they've become more politically polarized, although I suppose one could say the same of the broader population in general.
I don't think entitlement is the right word either.
Polarized and politically different. This cohort is the leading edge of a massive tip toward a majority minority flip in american demographics. They're also acutely aware that the economic policies of the past 35 years have issues but they are divided on what those issues are. So, yes, polarized like the nation but different. Most people under 20 think it a standard custom to state one's preferred pronoun which, I guess, is just a shift in gender consciousness, but there are other differences that are hard for me to put my finger on other than politics, expectations, and sense of future are DIFFERENT. It's like an axis tilting. The compass used to point left-vs-right and now it points communitarian-vs-individualism with everything rotated such that not much maps the way it used to.
I don't think it is a bad thing. It's a necessary evolution. It's just a thing.
...I get the feeling that, like all things, this is more than a little gendered. People writing about male-dominated online spaces (such as 4chan and competitive gaming) seem to be respected and given lucrative publishing contracts, while "acafans" writing about female-dominated online spaces (primarily fanfiction) are marginalized and have to publish in essay collections put out by second- and third-tier academic presses.
Not sure about that. I know guys who did work in these areas and were marginalized in the academic presses, etc. There are a few women who are somewhat successful in these areas. All that said, even 10+ years ago I knew to stay FAR FAR FAR away else career ruined.
That said, there is a stench of sexism that permeates academic research in areas that touch on social interactions. Based on where I have been and what I have seen, much of the sexism goes hand in hand with what is considered "transformational research" (aka, fundable with an NSF grant or equiv) and what is considered a "technology transfer" opportunity (aka, something that can be patented, spinned off as a company/start-up, etc.). Really, it is just a mirror of society's sexism rather than something specific to academia, methinks.
no subject
That said, I know far Far FAR MORE people who have no good options post academia and in-academia is full of suck for the vast majority. I ... never experienced the suck (and it isn't like I am old either). I guess that puts me some rare unicorn status... :/
Anyhoo.
My own (admittedly limited) impression of people in that age cohort is that they've become more politically polarized, although I suppose one could say the same of the broader population in general.
I don't think entitlement is the right word either.
Polarized and politically different. This cohort is the leading edge of a massive tip toward a majority minority flip in american demographics. They're also acutely aware that the economic policies of the past 35 years have issues but they are divided on what those issues are. So, yes, polarized like the nation but different. Most people under 20 think it a standard custom to state one's preferred pronoun which, I guess, is just a shift in gender consciousness, but there are other differences that are hard for me to put my finger on other than politics, expectations, and sense of future are DIFFERENT. It's like an axis tilting. The compass used to point left-vs-right and now it points communitarian-vs-individualism with everything rotated such that not much maps the way it used to.
I don't think it is a bad thing. It's a necessary evolution. It's just a thing.
...I get the feeling that, like all things, this is more than a little gendered. People writing about male-dominated online spaces (such as 4chan and competitive gaming) seem to be respected and given lucrative publishing contracts, while "acafans" writing about female-dominated online spaces (primarily fanfiction) are marginalized and have to publish in essay collections put out by second- and third-tier academic presses.
Not sure about that. I know guys who did work in these areas and were marginalized in the academic presses, etc. There are a few women who are somewhat successful in these areas. All that said, even 10+ years ago I knew to stay FAR FAR FAR away else career ruined.
That said, there is a stench of sexism that permeates academic research in areas that touch on social interactions. Based on where I have been and what I have seen, much of the sexism goes hand in hand with what is considered "transformational research" (aka, fundable with an NSF grant or equiv) and what is considered a "technology transfer" opportunity (aka, something that can be patented, spinned off as a company/start-up, etc.). Really, it is just a mirror of society's sexism rather than something specific to academia, methinks.