Sep. 18th, 2015

rynling: (Teh Bowz)
I'm trying to read an academic study of a popular author, and I can't understand any of it. Any passage chosen at random is equally unintelligible to me. For example:

Postmodernism's radical compression of perspective negates ontological stratification, necessitating a restructuring of the hermeneutics of expression. The inviolability of the self is crystallized into the physical, mechanical 'black box,' the disparate elements of a dimensional subjectivity rendered anthropomorphic entities with individual consciousness and agency distinct from the originary monad, and the Freudian divisions of the psyche externalized onto geographical terrain, with the subterranean naturally corresponding to the territory of the repressed. The disenchantment with the strata model must then necessarily give way to an alternative dialectics of ontology.

I think what the writer is trying to say here is that many postmodern authors reject a simple division between the conscious and the unconscious...

...but I'm not sure??

Sometimes I start thinking that I'm smart, and then I remember that mostly I'm just talented at pretending to be smart. People who are actually smart live in a different universe.

Profile

rynling: (Default)
Rynling R&D

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
89 101112 13 14
1516 1718 19 20 21
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 21st, 2026 02:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios