rynling: (Ganondorf)
Casual Viewing: Why Netflix looks like that
https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-49/essays/casual-viewing/

One tag among Netflix’s thirty-six thousand microgenres offers a suitable name for this kind of dreck: “casual viewing.” Usually reserved for breezy network sitcoms, reality television, and nature documentaries, the category describes much of Netflix’s film catalog — movies that go down best when you’re not paying attention, or as the Hollywood Reporter recently described Atlas, a 2024 sci-fi film starring Jennifer Lopez, “another Netflix movie made to half-watch while doing laundry.” A high-gloss product that dissolves into air. Tide Pod cinema.

This is a long article, but it's fascinating to read. Be warned, though - it's also extremely depressing.

Scavengers

Sep. 25th, 2024 07:52 am
rynling: (Default)
This is a seven-minute animation about xenobiology. It was apparently turned into a Netflix show, and that's cool, but these seven minutes are perfect.

rynling: (Mog Toast)
If nothing else, replaying Oxenfree helped me remember what an absolute miracle Night in the Woods was when it was released in 2017. The writing in NITW is so good, and it's such a joy to move through Possum Springs. I'm also due for a replay of Kentucky Route Zero, come to think of it.

While doing some research about the game’s reception, I learned that Netflix acquired the Oxenfree development team, Night School Studio, in 2021. Netflix produced Oxenfree II, and I read that there’s a live-action series adaptation of Oxenfree in production. This sounds nice, to be honest. Crossmedia adaptations don’t always succeed, but I get the impression that Oxenfree might actually work much better if it weren’t an interactive video game.

ODDTAXI

Feb. 15th, 2022 07:30 am
rynling: (Cool Story Bro)
I finished watching ODDTAXI last night. Because I'm not super into crime drama, it was never going to be one of those anime that fucking changed me holy fuck, but it's still a solid 9/10 show with interesting art and excellent writing and voice acting.

About halfway through, around Episode 7, you start to get a sense of why everyone looks like an animal. I don't want to spoil it, except to say that there are no actual elements of fantasy or science fiction. The twist is something that could only be done with animation, and it's brilliant.

I think the closest comparable show is probably the first season of Durarara, which also has an urban ensemble cast who all turn out to be connected at the end. In addition, both shows are oddly heartwarming despite being filled with child trafficking and murder.

All of the ODDTAXI characters appear as human during the final episode, and it's really cool. I think getting to see what nonhuman characters look like as human might be one of my favorite visual tropes. The story game Mutazione handles this in an interesting and memorable way too. If I had to be honest, I think this is one of the appeals of Ganon for me as well, that he's secretly human (and also attractive). Fingers crossed that Breath of the Wild 2 does as good of a job with its villain-monster's human form as a one-season anime about a middle-aged taxi driver.

Squid Game

Oct. 8th, 2021 08:05 am
rynling: (Mog Toast)
Its good.

Also I want one of those tracksuits.
rynling: (Ganondorf)
I'm not trying to say that queering or straightening any given text or textual influence is good or bad, because both have their uses.

Rather, I'm uninterested in discussions of gender-based purity politics relating to women and gay people and media created by women and gay people. Not everything needs to be about the interests of straight adult men.

(Like, can you imagine if Revolutionary Girl Utena had to be subjected to that sort of discussion, how tedious would that be.)

Just let Sailor Moon wear magical sparkly nail polish under her elbow-length gloves, this is not the root of all misogyny.
rynling: (Ganondorf)
Someone recently asked me what I thought about She-Ra's transformation sequence, and how it might function as a subversion of the transformation sequence in Sailor Moon. My hot take on this is that it's an homage, not a subversion. It would only be a "subversion" if you consider the original to have problematic elements worth subverting. To be honest, the She-Ra henshin feels like a somewhat bowdlerized downgrade of the original.

The process of "straightening" a piece of media involves sanitizing its queer and messy and sexy elements in order to gain the approval of an audience concerned with morals and purity. Despite having strong LGBTQ+ representation, She-Ra works hard to straighten its influences and source texts, and I've never been able to get into it because it's just not that interesting to me. It's not weird, it's not funny, and I don't need a group of cartoon teenagers to teach me lessons about friendship. I'm not saying that She-Ra is a "bad" show and doesn't have cultural value, but rather that someone like me is not the target audience.

I think the problem with "representation" is that, if you contentiously bear the burden of representing minority identities, then you have to be careful to be as neat and clean as possible. People will take it personally and come after you if you slip up, so you have to be "wholesome" and "inclusive." This expectation is exponentially more pronounced in children's media (and young adult fiction), in which you have to presume that your audience will not be able to understand nuance or complicated positionalities.

(By "complicated positionality,"
I'm primarily referring to someone whose experience of prejudice has left them with prejudices of their own. An example would be a Lithuanian who fled the Holocaust to Kazakhstan, was treated poorly by a local population that wasn't prepared to accept refugees, and now lives in Israel and refuses to speak to Filipina caretakers because she hates everyone she considers to be "Asian.")

In other words, in order to create "good representation," your depiction can't offend anyone, which means it has to be boring.

And honestly, I don't think boring representation is actually that useful. In fact, I think it smells a little like tokenism. This is why, to me, the weirdness and messiness and "problematic" sexuality of Sailor Moon is a lot more compelling to queer identity formation than She-Ra, which often reads like it's coming directly out of Tumblr purity politics.
rynling: (Mog Toast)
The one thing I was super impressed with is how the editors managed to get so much footage without anyone saying the n-word once. In fact, the absence of that word is so natural that you don’t even think about it. I kept waiting for it to happen, and my admiration for the documentary grew with each episode that it didn’t.

I mean, this is a documentary about white trash in rural areas. I’m familiar with the Florida accent, and I’m familiar with the Oklahoma accent. I know how white people with those accents actually talk, and I would be very surprised if they weren’t making casual racial slurs without thinking twice. Not because they’re racist, per se, but because that’s just the linguistic culture of “the South.”

And there would be no reason for the people being interviewed not to feel comfortable using racial slurs in casual conversation. The three big cat owners profiled by the documentary – Joe Exotic, Doc Antle, and Carole Baskin – are only seen in the company of other white people. With one (charming and perfect nonbinary hero of my heart) exception, they only work with other white people, and all of their business contacts and associates are white as well. When you look at shots of the diverse crowds who come to their zoos, as well as the diverse crowds of people who showed up to Joe Exotic’s various publicity events while he was running for public office, you can clearly see that these are not “white parts of the world” engaging in “white culture.” Still, these three zoo owners are the sort of white people who only surround themselves with other white people.

Joe Exotic is a creepy and abusive asshole, Doc Antle is a creepy and abusive sex pest, and I cannot for the life of me figure out why Twitter is so in love with Carole Baskin, who is not an asshole or a sex pest or abusive but still manages to creep me out.

(I should say that my take on Carole Baskin has nothing to do with the allegations that she murdered her disgusting millionaire ex-husband and fed him to her tigers. If she did, good for her.)

Regardless, I think the documentary is trying to portray Joe Exotic as some sort of contemporary folk hero (which he MOST DEFINITELY is not), and showing him and the people he worked with actually use the racial slurs common to their vernacular would have flown directly in the face of that message.

It’s been so surprising to me to see a surge of interest in the South during the past three or four years, with people from places like Brooklyn and Boston and Chicago and Seattle saying that they love sweet tea and that they’re fans of country music. NPR’s Radiolab just did a special on Dolly Parton, and even Steven Universe is saying “y’all” now. And I guess, if Southern culture and vernacular are scrubbed and sanitized in such as way that Joe Exotic never says the n-word and Carol Baskin doesn’t have to answer any questions about why all her volunteers are white, then Southern culture might seem appealing in a “folksy” sort of way.

(This is the reason why the ending of Kentucky Route Zero was so bizarre to me, by the way. In the wake of a devastating natural disaster, a found family of hipsters decides to settle in an isolated farming town. Unlike what happened in New Orleans, this is a good thing, because fuck capitalism, amirite. There’s a lovely funeral for a horse in which a white urban transplant from Chicago sings a gospel song while a mixed-race gay couple stands off to the side appreciatively, which is totally what rural Kentucky is like, definitely for sure.)

Tiger King

Apr. 8th, 2020 08:35 am
rynling: (Default)
My British football podcasts have all been watching Tiger King, so I started watching it too.

The seven-part documentary’s appeal, as far as I can tell, is that it will introduce an absurd situation only to then add a bizarre twist to the story, and this keeps happening. The narrative structure is extremely clever; but, given that these are all real people, it comes off as gross and exploitative. In the way of Netflix original series, the show also feels overlong and a bit bloated.

Tiger King is uncomfortable to watch, as all of the people involved have strong personalities that often come off, to me at least, as cringe. I also can’t help but think, “Oh god, am I like that? Is this how people see me for writing fanfic and drawing comics? Like, this person is just way too into video games?”

I’ve been going through the show in fifteen-minute segments, and I’m currently about two-thirds of the way through the third episode. Based on my current progress, this is the three-point metric I’ve come up with to gauge whether your hobby has landed you in crazytown:

(1) Are you spending thousands of dollars on it every month?
(2) Are you using it as a lure to entrap vulnerable people into sexual relationships?
(3) Are you so invested in it that you’ve made concrete attempts to end another person’s life?

The first point is borderline, because rich people hobbies (sailing and horseback riding, for example) can be expensive. I also know a few not-so-rich people who spend a lot of money on make-up and clothing, both mainstream and subcultural (like cosplay and Lolita fashion). The second two points are fairly clear, however – there’s no way to justify sexual assault and attempted murder as healthy behaviors.

Still, if you're not plotting to murder anyone or putting confused young people into situations where they can't say "no" to you, your interest in your hobby is probably still in the normal range.

Anyway, I’m probably not going to keep watching the show. A friend recommended the 2019 New York magazine article Tiger King Joe Exotic and His American Animals, and I appreciate how it presents the story of these people without the clickbait Netflix documentary bullshit.
rynling: (Ganondorf)
This three-part documentary series on Netflix is really upsetting, and I mean really upsetting. It's difficult to write a summary, but basically, a group of people on Facebook tries to track down a man who posts videos of himself killing animals, thus giving him the attention he craves and inspiring him to post a video of himself killing another human being. The documentary itself is well-made and doesn't show the grisly bits of the actual videos, but it's still not a pleasant experience to watch. Thankfully, there's nothing particularly sensationalist about the project, and the "internet nerds" are presented as normal and intelligent adults.

The director has said that he created this documentary for the purpose of spreading awareness, which I appreciate. My experience with trying to get my anxiety treated over the course of the past year has been that a lot of people - especially people born before around 1980 or so - just don't understand how violent and upsetting online engagement can be sometimes. Even people my age and younger haven't responded well when I try to talk about this, and common responses include:

- Maybe the person attacking you has a mental illness. (That's not a valid justification.)
- Maybe you shouldn't spend so much time online. (That's not the problem.)
- Maybe you deserve this. (No one "deserves" death and rape threats.)

What I think people who haven't experienced extended episodes of online harassment aren't getting is that sometimes it's possible to encounter people on the internet who are genuinely scary. When you become the target of a person like this (as one of the primary "narrators" in Don't F**k With Cats does), it has nothing to do with you specifically, and there's really nothing you can do about it. 

I also recently read the book Nobody's Victim, which is written by Carrie Goldberg, a lawyer and advocate for victims of internet stalking and harassment. This book is just as upsetting as Don't F**k With Cats, especially since many of the people Goldberg represents (as well as Goldberg herself) have had to suffer through intense and pervasive victim blaming. No one they go to for help understands what happened to them, and everyone thinks the fact that they became the targets of scary people is somehow their fault. Very few people believe what they're saying in the first place, and a lot of the evidence they produce to document what they've experienced is used against them.

I personally haven't been the target of anything as severe as what appears in Don't F**k With Cats and Nobody's Victim (thank goodness), but it was still very easy for me to recognize the patterns of how popular online platforms enable abusive modes of behavior and the hate crimes of disturbed people. I'm finally starting to see people within fandom share resources (like this) discussing best practices regarding how to process and handle these types of encounters, and that's wonderful, but I'm really looking forward to there being a greater awareness of these issues in mainstream society as well.
rynling: (Default)
I dislike musicals; but, other than the singing, the Steven Universe movie is fantastic. I cried a lot, and it was cathartic. There was a lot of internet discourse surrounding the central conflict, and some of it was very, very smart. My own opinion is that everything everyone has said is valid.

Steven Universe Future is also good. Some of the episodes are very on the nose about “life lessons,” but it’s actually useful to see models of different responses to relatable situations. I feel like a lot of the cartoons I watched as a kid involved “morals” concerning why different nationalities are evil, so it’s nice to finally have access to a sincere treatment of how to handle scenarios like “being honest with yourself about an invitation you extended to someone out of obligation even though you knew it would make you feel weird.”

The artwork is ridiculously gorgeous. I’ve started rewatching the movie and new episodes with the sound off so that I can appreciate the visuals on their own, and it’s been filling me with inspiration and creative energy.

Between the impeachment proceedings, JK Rowling finally being held publicly accountable for her transphobic bullshit, and the new season of Steven Universe, I feel like some sort of awful curse is gradually being lifted.
rynling: (Ganondorf)
I liked the first season of Stranger Things, and the second grew on me.

The third season was difficult to watch. There was a lot of yelling and strobe lights and violence, which gradually escalated to the point where there wasn’t much else. I love horror movies and don’t mind violence when it’s weird or unexpected or choreographed in a visually interesting way, but the third season of Stranger Things was filled with a lot of bog-standard punching and shooting.

The first three episodes in the season set up a few compelling story threads, but they’re all dropped in favor of the punching and shooting. There’s a beautiful conversation between two teenagers in a mall bathroom in the second-to-last episode that made me cry (kind of a whole lot), but a lot of the dialogue was shouted in anger or panic. I fast-forwarded through huge chunks of the last five (of eight) episodes and scrolled through animal pictures of various social media platforms during the rest of the time. In other words, the “exciting” fights and chase scenes of the third season were profoundly boring to me.

The reviews were generally positive, and I found myself wondering if this is what people really want. Did someone complain about the character development and worldbuilding in the first two seasons? I assumed the violence was filler for a decay in the writing quality, but were people genuinely pleased that there were less feelings and more punching? I’m happy to look at a piece of media and say “This isn’t for me,” but…

When I was a kid, I loved three things: dinosaurs, space, and science. My parents were religious and very conservative about gender roles, however, so they were constantly taking things I liked away from me and saying “this isn’t for you,” whether it was a radio I enjoyed taking apart and putting back together or a cheap plastic Godzilla a friend gave me for my birthday. I remember being so confused, like, Why isn’t this for me? Who was being hurt by the fact I liked it?

Between Hollow Knight not having an easy mode and Justin McElroy’s painful review of Night in the Woods and the third season of Stranger Things, I’ve recently been feeling like my sense of “this isn’t for me” is less of a personal decision and more of an externally imposed set of arbitrary social standards regarding who certain types of media should belong to, and it’s frustrating.
rynling: (Gator Strut)
If you've watched the Netflix show Tidying Up with Marie Kondo, then you can confirm that its appeal is a combination of three things: One, judging other people's lives, two, psychoanalyzing other people's damage, and three, Marie Kondo's facial expressions. The first two are standard reality television, but the third is really special. I don't say this ironically; Marie Kondo is an interesting person, and it's a pleasure to watch her interact with people and move through space.

As far as I can tell, the reaction to the show on Twitter has been humorously nihilistic, like, "How do I throw myself away" and "The joke's on you, Marie Kondo - I no longer know how to experience joy." In print media, the running joke about The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up has been that none of us can escape the awful capitalist hell we've trapped ourselves in, and not even Marie Kondo can save us now. (See, for example, this cartoon that ran two years ago in The New Yorker.) Also, some people have gotten passionate about not wanting to throw away their books, and other people have mocked them for their performative intellectualism, and this exchange has become a meme in and of itself.

And then, after two weeks of people having fun with a silly show on Netflix, other people started bringing race into the equation. If you watched the show, you're racist. If you didn't watch the show, you're racist. If you make fun of Marie Kondo, you're racist. If you respect and appreciate Marie Kondo, you're racist. If you have no idea who Marie Kondo is but still insist on folding your shirts in a certain way, you're racist and you don't even know it.

The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up was originally published in translation in 2014 by Ten Speed Press, a small outfit in California that specializes in "healthy lifestyle" and crafting books. They have a good list of nonfiction and autobio comics as well; and, if you've ever seen one of those ridiculous "How to Draw Manga" books in a chain bookstore, they probably published it. The press commissions a lot of translations, and their scope is fairly international. When they put out their translation of The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up, they gave it the subtitle "The Japanese Art of Decluttering and Organizing" not because they were playing to some sort of "Oriental mysticism" but because there is a huge market for books like The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living and The Gentle Art of Swedish Death Cleaning: How to Free Yourself and Your Family from a Lifetime of Clutter and Bringing Up Bébé: One American Mother Discovers the Wisdom of French Parenting. Essentially, people in the United States want to escape the awful capitalist hell we've created for ourselves, so we want people in other "developed" countries to tell us what we're doing wrong and how to fix it.

I won't deny that racism may play a part in this, because we live in a system of global white supremacy in which racism plays a part in everything, but what the publishing market has done is to group Japan with what I think it's fair to call "fancy Europe," which is problematic but not, I think, overtly racist. In the book itself, which is a translation of something originally published in 2010 in Japanese (人生がときめく片づけの魔法), Kondo does indeed talk to her Japanese readers about "ancient Japanese cleaning rituals." Japanese writers have been doing this before America existed, however, and they will probably continue doing this after America fails. I therefore don't think it's fair to make American conceptions of Orientalism the center of a conversation about what's going on there.

This is what bothers me so much about the application of American configurations of race to who Marie Kondo is and what she's doing and how her work has been received - America is not the center of this particular transnational cultural phenomenon, and assuming its centrality is not "racist," exactly, but extremely arrogant. Within the specific context of American conversations about the Netflix show on Twitter, there are so many different voices from so many different people that you would specifically have to go looking for white people being racist. They exist, obviously, but who does it benefit to treat their gross fringe options as the most important voices while ignoring everyone else?

Meanwhile, speaking of Japan-America relations, the nuclear waste from the Manhattan Project is (still) under St. Louis, and it's still giving people cancer; and, if you care about such things, it's still disproportionately affecting African-American communities. Flint, Michigan still doesn't have clean water, and we're still imprisoning the children of refugees, and the federal government is still shut down because of a legitimately racist pissing match over a "border wall," and... I mean, you know, everything. I feel like such a Republican Grandpa when I bitch about people (mostly white people, let's be real) getting upset about inconsequential things on Twitter, but I also feel that we're all constantly under assault during the administration of POTUS45, and the sort of incessant angry buzzing noise generated by endless waves of thinkpiece articles about how some innocuous Netflix show might be covertly racist only makes everyone more exhausted without actually doing anything to help anyone.
rynling: (Gator Strut)
Me: You know...

Me: ...you could clear up a lot of space in your house...

Me: ...by divorcing your condescending prick of a husband.

Me: I'm just saying.
rynling: (Cecil Palmer)
I finished watching the second season of Stranger Things, and I have two things I want to add to my original post. First: the seventh episode was brilliant and beautiful, and I loved it. The moral of the story is not to trust what men say about television shows about young women, especially when the characters of the young women in question are difficult and complicated. Second: the alien creatures get fed in the eighth episode, AND BOY DO THEY EVER. I think the viewer's response to one particularly grisly scene is supposed to be horror, but I was filled with contentment and satisfaction.

My three main ships are:
- Dustin Henderson and his monster pet Dart
- Steve Harrington and his nail-studded baseball bat
- Eleven's spiritual sister Kali Prasad and myself

My three favorite characters are:
- Lucas Sinclair's little sister Erica, who steals every scene that she's in
- Sam Owens, the head doctor/scientist who is in a difficult situation but has a good heart
- Nancy and Mike's mother Karen Wheeler, who reads romance novels in the bathtub and drinks too much and is frustrated with her shitty husband but loves and trusts her children unconditionally
rynling: (Ganondorf)
I'm watching the second season of Stranger Things, and I'm stuck on episode six for two reasons. First, everyone says episode seven is awful; and second, because everything I have seen is very good and I want to spread it out.

Even though Stranger Things is set in Indiana, a lot of it was actually filmed in the town where I grew up in Georgia, Jackson. The pharmacy where Winona Ryder works is really there, and my aunt used to work there until she moved to a Wal-Mart pharmacy in a white neighborhood where she wouldn't have to see so many black and Hispanic people. Make America Great Again!

The Radio Shack where Samwise Gamgee works is also really there, and Sean Astin's character reminds me of someone who really used to work there. Let's call him Jim, because that is his name. The way I tell Jim's story is going to sound elitist as hell, and this is probably because I'm an asshole, but bear with me.

Jim had the misfortune of being born in a tiny backwards town in rural Georgia with dreams and ambitions. His real problem, though, was that he didn't realize that he was only a big fish in a small pond. He went to college at UGA, which is a big deal for someone from a place where most people don't graduate from high school. (Or, if they do, it's because their parents put them in a private school where they didn't have to see black and Hispanic people. Make America Great Again!) Once Jim got to college, however, he didn't do so well, and so he came back to work at Radio Shack in Jackson, where he could be the college boy who went off and did good and came back to be the smartest person in town.

Although there could be some sort of plot twist later in season two, Sean Astin's character seems to be a huge nerd but is genuinely intelligent and almost radically kind. Meanwhile, Jim has found solace for the fact that his grand ambitions were not realized in the alt-right movement, and now he spends his free time at work getting on social media and, for example, linking to articles that attack progressive politics by saying that people who do not support Trump are basically Nazis so that he can stage debates in the comments, like so:



My point here is that, even though I love Stranger Things, I'm immensely distrustful of its cultural nostalgia. I understand the critique of late Cold War Reagan-era America that it's presenting with its scary white male doctors and scientists who insist on refusing any sort of social or political oversight while they abuse children, but the actual legacy of the 1980s in places like the fictional Hawkins, Indiana or the real Jackson, Georgia is white supremacy and xenophobic nationalism. This is why I've spent the show being more afraid of Winona Ryder's "nice guy" boyfriend than I am of any of the alien creatures.

Speaking of which: PLEASE FEED THOSE ALIEN CREATURES, they look very hungry and I am concerned.
rynling: (Terra Branford)
Some lovely and wonderful person left a comment on one of my Powser fics saying that the bickering between Peach and Bowser reminds her of the dialog on Archer. I was like, What the fuck is Archer. Five hours later, the Netflix app on my PS4 was telling me that prolonged periods of physical inactivity may be accompanied by health risks.

What I've been trying to capture in the Peach/Bowser dynamic is a theme I'm going to call "adults being shitty to one another." I'm not into sexy kidnapping or any sort of Beauty and the Beast redemption nonsense; I'm into the idea that both characters have terrible personalities. Bowser is thoughtlessly obnoxious, Peach is cloyingly passive-aggressive, and they're both extremely narcissistic.

I thought I'd made good progress in how I write the characters, but watching Archer has taught me just how much of a novice I am at adults being shitty to one another. I need to step up my game, and I want to get started by writing flashfic. Here are some scenarios I came up with:

* Peach shits on Bowser for buying ridiculous things
* Bowser taunts Peach for not having children
* Peach cuts Bowser down for complaining about villainy and double standards
* Bowser mocks Peach for being obsessed with beauty products
* Peach gets up in Bowser's business for eating nothing but garbage
* Bowser tries to bully Peach into admitting she has a problem with alcohol
* Peach and Bowser bring on the snark as they speculate about who Mario and Luigi are dating
* Peach and Bowser accuse each other of being an unpopular character in Super Smash Bros
* Peach and Bowser get nasty and jealous about Zelda and Ganondorf
* Bowser gets sloppy drunk and calls Peach
* Peach watches Bridget Jones and calls Bowser

The romance, such as it is, needs to come from the sense that these two garbage people have somehow managed to find an equally garbage partner; and that, underneath their spiteful pettiness, they care about one another because of their flaws, not in spite of them. A lot of shipfic I read tries to normalize characters with difficult personalities through romance, but honestly bros, that sort of thing stopped being interesting to me a long time ago.
rynling: (Silver)
Title: Mahou Shoujo Nante Mou Ii Desu Kara
Episode Duration: 4 minutes
Synopsis: A middle school student is fed the fuck up with being a magical girl.
Why I'm Watching It: The protagonist has no problem saying what we're all thinking vis-à-vis the male gaze.

Title: Ojisan to Marshmallow
Episode Duration: 3 minutes 30 seconds
Synopsis: A female sex pest publicly harasses an overweight salary worker with marshmallows.
Why I'm Watching It: I can't look away.

Title: Ooyasan wa Shishunki!
Episode Duration: 2 minutes
Synopsis: A college student moves into an apartment building managed by a middle school girl.
Why I'm Watching It: I'm intrigued by the (extremely) oblique suggestion that the girl killed her parents.

Title: Oshiete! Galko-chan
Episode Duration: 7 minutes 50 seconds
Synopsis: Two high school girls discuss common myths pertaining to female bodies.
Why I'm Watching It: The fact that the takes-no-shit popular girl and the cynical nerdy girl share an easygoing and uncomplicated friendship hits me right in the feels.

Title: Yamishibai, 3rd Season
Episode Duration: 4 minutes 30 seconds
Synopsis: A series of demonic women kill and devour hapless men.
Why I'm Watching It: For me this show is like a glossy lifestyle magazine. I feel like I should be taking notes.
rynling: (Celes Chere)
Read 100 books.

I read 156 books. In addition, I read 112 graphic novels. I also read 235 manga in English, 53 manga in Japanese, and 115 dōjinshi. It's anal retentive to keep track of shit like this, but I swear I have a good reason. Or rather, it's a horrible reason and an uphill battle I will never be able to win. Maybe I'll write about it one day, or maybe I'll just let it simmer in the stew of my feelings of inadequacy; either course of action is equally terrible.

Post one book review a month.

I made 32 posts to my professional blog, which had 108,795 views in 2015. This is up from last year but way down from 2013, when I became the target of legions of asshole trolls from Reddit and 4chan. The blog also has about two thousand subscribers across several feed reader services. Considering how specialized the subject matter is and how infrequently I update, I think I'm doing well for myself. Now if only I could convert this success to money.

Leave two comments on AO3 a month.

I kept a running total of all the comments (with a complicated set of rules for what does and doesn't count) that I made across AO3, Tumblr, and ff.net, and I ended up with 109 comments. I'm not sure if that's a lot – it's certainly far less than my yearly total of comments when I was active on Livejournal – but I feel like I did okay. I'm not saying that the comments I did leave weren't sometimes awkward as fuck; but hopefully, at the very least, I helped to improve the intersite and search engine rankings of a small handful of stories.

Watch some quality tee-vee.

Fuck television, I hate television. I canceled my subscription to Netflix months ago. I managed to get through the first season of Hannibal and four seasons of Parks and Rec, and they weren't bad, but I felt like I was wasting time that I could have spent playing video games. Instead of actually watching anything, I decided to cheat by listening to the podcast Pop Culture Happy Hour and appropriating the opinions of its hosts whenever someone tries to talk to me about television. I did watch a ton of anime though.
rynling: (Cecil Harvey)
I can read and play games for hours, but I dislike television, even on my new huge big screen. What I do with sitcoms and anime is to watch about five minutes per day of a handful of shows through an app on my game machine before I start playing. I can sit through five minutes of anything, and in this way I can more or less keep current and not be that hipster who never watches tv.

Hannibal, though. Each episode is an hour long, meaning that it takes me two weeks to watch one of them, and it's even more time consuming in that for every five minutes I spend watching it I spend at least ten minutes sitting there afterwards getting angry about how stupid it is.

I understand the fandom for Sherlock, because Sherlock is witty, beautifully produced, and a lot of fun; the central OTP has fantastic chemistry, and the supporting cast is brilliant. A sizable portion of the Sherlock writers and artists moved to the Hannibal fandom over the past year, and I don't get it. Are we watching the same show? Are they seeing something I'm not?

This is why I'm deathly afraid of watching Doctor Who. Hannibal will finish its run and the fandom will move on, but I don't want to risk becoming one of the people who hates the source text for an always-fandom. I already have enough trouble with my feelings about Star Trek.

Profile

rynling: (Default)
Rynling R&D

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4567 8 9 10
11121314151617
181920 21 22 23 24
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 08:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios