The Stanley Parable
Jan. 7th, 2023 10:20 amI’ve been interested in The Stanley Parable for almost a decade now. It was recently ported to the Nintendo Switch, so I was finally able to play it. I spent about an hour with the game, and I got seven of the (I think there are nineteen?) endings.
People say that talking about The Stanley Parable will spoil it, but I don’t think that’s true. The basic premise of this game is easy to describe, and there’s not much to spoil. Also, I don’t think there’s any need to ascribe some sort of mystical depth to a short game created by two college-age men as a portfolio demo back in 2011. The Stanley Parable is interesting, but I want to try to explain why it left a bad taste in my mouth.
( Read more... )
I would say that The Stanley Parable is still worth playing, but I don’t think it’s worth the $25 that the developers are charging for it. That price tag is actually kind of insulting, especially given the message of the game.
Also, for half the price you could play What Remains of Edith Finch, another narrated walking simulator that is genuinely beautiful (and substantial) and asks many of the same metadiegetic questions with much more sympathy, nuance, and self-reflection.
People say that talking about The Stanley Parable will spoil it, but I don’t think that’s true. The basic premise of this game is easy to describe, and there’s not much to spoil. Also, I don’t think there’s any need to ascribe some sort of mystical depth to a short game created by two college-age men as a portfolio demo back in 2011. The Stanley Parable is interesting, but I want to try to explain why it left a bad taste in my mouth.
( Read more... )
I would say that The Stanley Parable is still worth playing, but I don’t think it’s worth the $25 that the developers are charging for it. That price tag is actually kind of insulting, especially given the message of the game.
Also, for half the price you could play What Remains of Edith Finch, another narrated walking simulator that is genuinely beautiful (and substantial) and asks many of the same metadiegetic questions with much more sympathy, nuance, and self-reflection.