Date: 2021-11-20 01:52 pm (UTC)
rynling: (Mog Toast)
From: [personal profile] rynling
The criticisms I've seen are basically:

- Nintendo contracted a third-party developer and forced them to work under horrible crunch conditions.

- Nintendo is charging $60 for a fifteen-year-old game that doesn't have any substantial changes aside from its updated graphics.

- Nintendo has made a few questionable decisions about how this game fits into competitive multiplayer tournaments. I haven't played Pokémon competitively in almost ten years, so I'm not sure I understand what people are saying here. But they sure are saying it.

My own impression is that it's a cute game that took me right back to 2006. It's a bit uncanny to see the polished graphics transposed against the super-retro gameplay, especially after playing Sword and Shield, and I think Let's Go Pikachu and Eevee were much better remakes. Nintendo really shouldn't have charged $60 for Brilliant Diamond and Shining Pearl, but what can you do. They were fishing for people who have more nostalgia than sense, and they got me.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

rynling: (Default)
Rynling R&D

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23456 7
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 11:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios