rynling: (Gators)
[personal profile] rynling
I bitch and moan about GenAI, but I think it’s important to emphasize that it’s not all one thing, and that many applications of these programs can be super useful. Like in language learning, for instance, or in helping researchers in STEM fields organize and present data. Just because some people are evil and stupid and lazy doesn’t mean the technology is “bad” by default.

One of my many problems with the hypocrisy of woke academics is that they put all their time and energy into “calling out” and “critiquing” abstract problems while all but ignoring more specific material problems that they can actually solve. Like sure, we need to resist Islamophobia. Of course we do!! But also, how about paying our Arabic teachers a living wage? Like maybe more than $4k a class, a salary that hasn’t been raised in more than twenty years?

With this in mind, I started attending (via Zoom) labor organization meetings. Something like 80% of my university’s faculty is severely underpaid, not to mention employed on extremely precarious annual contracts. The current political climate isn’t helping. I’m not convinced that I can actually be useful to anyone, but it’s been interesting to follow the process.

In the most recent meeting, what a union leader from another school said is that the university will attempt to frustrate organizational efforts by dividing the faculty in different programs along ideological lines. One example she gave involved ChatGPT; namely, how most Humanities people hate it and want it to be banned while STEM people tend to be more curious and permissive.

For me at least, that really hammered down the point that the “enemy” isn’t necessarily the technology itself. Rather, it’s how institutions use the technology to exacerbate pre-existing inequalities related to labor.

Date: 2025-07-03 05:59 pm (UTC)
lassarina: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lassarina
That last sentence is pretty much the whole AI thing in a nutshell, yeah. A surprisingly nonzero number of the people who are at the top of the food chain for some of the AI things have said repeatedly that one thing they expect to come out of AI is a UBI policy because of what AI can do w/r/t labor, but....then there's putting your money where your mouth is and that whole idea is very Someone Else Will Handle It! to them. like nah dude own your consequences please.

Profile

rynling: (Default)
Rynling R&D

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 234 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 01:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios